Jump to Navigation

New York NY Civil Rights Law Blog

New York schools attempt to fix sex discrimination in sports

Few people dispute the necessity of equality in athletic opportunities for students. With this year marking the 40th anniversary of Title IX's passage, there is a lot to be celebrated for the progress our educational system has made in promoting athletic opportunities for female students. However, a recent decision from the New York City Department of Education regarding sex discrimination in school athletics has sparked a dispute.

In response to a federal investigation, the New York Public Schools Athletic League (PSAL) has focused almost entirely on forming new sports teams for girls. That move has left little room for new opportunities for male students attending newly opened high schools. Rather than forming teams for both girls and boys at new schools, PSAL has almost exclusively formed teams for female athletes.

Maternity leave and forced resignation: Young mother claims workplace discrimination

A young mother who worked as a senior program manager at a marketing company claims she experienced workplace discrimination when her company allegedly forced her resignation after she requested time off for maternity leave. Advocates for pregnant workers say many mothers are forced to deal with similar situations when they inform their employer of their pregnancy.

A 31-year-old mother-to-be informed her workplace about her pregnancy and instead of allowing the working woman to take maternity leave, the company asked the woman to resign from her position. The company informed the woman that she was not protected under the Family and Medical Leave Act because she had worked for the company for only four months. The Family and Medical Leave Act allows certain employees to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave a year. The time can be used to care for newborns or to take of sick family members. The FMLA is a federal law and therefore covers eligible working parents in New York.

The mother-to-be left her previous employer for a new position at the company four months earlier and human resources executives told the woman that whether she was sick or pregnant and did not show up to work her absence would be interpreted as a resignation because she had not been with the company for the requisite time period.

New York City police officer pleads guilty to false arrest

Two weeks ago we wrote about a New York City police officer accused of falsely arresting an African American man in Staten Island and later used a racial slur when bragging about the false arrest to a friend. The officer recently pleaded guilty to federal charges that he violated the falsely arrested man's constitutional rights.

Before the guilty plea was entered, the New York City police officer had been suspended without pay. After the entry of the guilty plea, the officer was immediately fired from the police department. As a part of the officer's plea deal, he promised to never question his termination and to never seek work in law enforcement again. In addition, he faces up to one year in jail and a $100,000 fine. The sentencing hearing has not yet occurred.

In April, the NYPD officer conducted a stop and frisk on a man in Staten Island. The stop and frisk did not reveal a weapon or any contraband and after the incident the man who was stopped complained about his treatment.

After the man voiced his complaint, the officer arrested the man and later completed a police report that falsely alleged the man resisted arrest. The officer later bragged to a friend over the phone about the arrest and used a racial slur in his description. Officers from the NYPD's internal affairs department and FBI investigators intercepted the phone call.

Actress's suit against Amazon reveals potential age discrimination trend

Many actresses and actors vie for spots in New York and Hollywood. In New York actors compete to be on Broadway and in Hollywood actors compete for roles in major films. One actress's suit against Amazon and its Internet Movie Database may have revealed a potential age discrimination issue in Hollywood.

Age discrimination is generally defined as treating an applicant or employee less favorably because of age. Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act employers are forbidden from discriminating against people age 40 or older. People under the age of 40 are not protected under the Act but may be protected by state law. Last fall, an actress filed a million-dollar suit against Amazon and Amazon's Internet Movie Database for identifying the woman's age on IMDB's website.

The lawsuit was likely not based on an age discrimination legal theory since Amazon or IMDB were not the actress's potential employer or employer, but the suit raised public awareness on potential age discrimination in television and film industry. Women over the age of 40 account for over 24 percent of the population in the United States, but according to the Screen Actors Guild only 12.5 percent of television and movie roles are filled by actresses over age 40. The proportion of men over age 40 who land roles is equal to proportion in the population.

NYPD officer accused of false arrest expected to plead guilty

The New York Police Department's controversial stop-and-frisk practice is back in the news after a Staten Island NYPD officer was accused of false arrest. According to court documents, the Staten Island cop falsely arrested an African American man in Stapleton, and the day after the arrest bragged to a friend about the incident using a racial slur. The 32-year-old officer allegedly involved in the incident is expected to plead guilty.

The alleged false arrest occurred on April 15, 2011 when the 32-year-old officer and his partner spotted an African American man walking on a street in Stapleton. The officers ordered the man to remove his hands from his pockets and allegedly pushed the man against a parked vehicle. According to the suit, the officers frisked the man in a rough manner, but no contraband or weapons were found.

The man, who was the target of the stop-and-frisk, voiced his displeasure about his treatment and asked the 32-year-old officer for his name and badge number. According to prosecutors, as the man walked away from the officers he shouted insults. The officers then crossed the street and arrested the man.

The police officer later explained the arrest to his superior, and the officer said he arrested the man after the man pushed him and started to wrestle with him. According to court documents, the officer said it eventually took four men to arrest the man. Afterward, the officer completed a complaint report in which he claimed the man resisted arrest.

Police watchdog group files NYC police misconduct cases involving Occupy protesters

New York City's police watchdog group, the Civilian Complaint Review Board, is going forward with multiple police misconduct cases involving Occupy protesters and New York City police officers. Although the police watchdog group is going forward with police misconduct cases related to the Occupy protesters, the overall number of complaints against the New York Police Department filed with the group is down in comparison to last year.

The Civilian Complaint Review Board has started 37 police misconduct complaints related to the Occupy Wall Street protests. There has been a total of 44 Occupy-related complaints filed against the New York Police Department, and the allegations involve 78 alleged victims.

Complaints related to Occupy Wall Street involve four types of offenses. The offenses are abuse of authority, force, offensive language and discourtesy. Twenty-nine of the 37 complaints being reviewed by the city's policy watchdog involve allegations that police improperly used force.

Despite the Occupy cases, complaints filed with the city's police watchdog panel dropped over 7 percent in 2011 in comparison to 2010. There were 6.467 complaints in 2010, and in 2011 there were 6,007 complaints. More than 60 percent of the complaints in 2010 were closed before a full investigation was conducted by the board. The Civilian Complaint Review Board corroborated 8 percent of 2010's complaints after a full investigation.

Potential police misconduct in case involving teen with pellet gun at school

When police officers encounter a suspect with a weapon, sometimes they mistakenly assume the worst. A potential case of police misconduct may have occurred in Texas yesterday when a teenager with a pellet gun was shot to death by police at school. Though the tragic case is not from New York, it still shows how quickly a situation can turn deadly because of a potential overuse of force.

Yesterday, a 15-year-old boy was shot three times in a hallway of a middle school in Brownsville, Texas. The tragic death was the result of a misunderstanding.

The incident began when the young boy walked into a classroom and punched a classmate in the face. When police arrived at the school, the 15-year-old appeared to have a handgun and according to police would not drop the weapon. Unknown to police, the handgun was actually a pellet gun.

The two police officers that confronted the 15-year-old asked the boy to drop the weapon multiple times but the boy refused. Though no one else was in the hallway because teachers locked classroom doors, the police officers fired a combined three shots. The 15-year-old was hit twice; once in the chest and once in the head.

Welcome to our New York City civil rights law blog

We established this blog to share stories and information about topics relevant to our practice. Our intent is to highlight local stories, as well as national subject matter, that we think you will find interesting. We will regularly update this blog and encourage you to share your thoughts on these posts.

Subscribe to This Blog's Feed Visit Our Civil Rights
Law Site

Contact Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Office Location

40 Wall Street
Suite 2809
The Trump Building
New York, NY 10005
Toll Free: 866-604-5923
Phone: 646-666-8518
Fax: 212-208-2933
Map and Directions